Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A disciplined, methodology-heavy instruction skill: it stays directive, gives concrete templates, naming examples, and an explicit final verification checklist, and avoids teaching concepts Claude already knows. All dimensions land at 4 due to minor cross-section redundancy, no worked micro-examples for the judgment-heavy analytical steps, an implicit rather than explicit error-recovery loop, and fully inlined detail in a single file.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the Quality gate against the body: state each verification item once as a checkable criterion rather than restating rules already given in Output model and Distillation standard.
Add one short worked example of a claim card and the finding it clusters into, so the judgment-heavy steps (build topics bottom-up, derive and select findings) have a concrete model to follow.
Make the quality gate an explicit feedback loop, e.g., 'If any check fails, fix the affected pages and re-verify before finishing,' since the workflow batch-creates and updates many files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is directive and assumes competence with no basic-concept padding (e.g., "Do not infer coverage from filenames or a search hit alone"), but the Quality gate partially restates earlier sections ("topic directories reflect analytical domains rather than source layout" repeats the Output model guidance), leaving minor trimming opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable instruction guidance throughout: a copy-paste OKF frontmatter template, an output-tree shape example, explicit naming examples ("revenue-quality/growth-shifted-from-volume-to-pricing.md" vs "finance/q2-report-summary.md"), and a specific claim-card recipe (subject, predicate, scope, time, evidence, status). A worked micro-example (e.g., a filled-in claim card or sample distillation page) would close the gap to fully concrete coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced workflow (frame → survey → build topics bottom-up → normalize → derive findings → write with provenance → integrate) ends in an explicit 13-item Quality gate, but for a batch write/update operation the validate→fix→retry loop is implicit rather than stated, which keeps it below the anchor-5 feedback-loop standard. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single well-organized self-contained file with clear section headers and no buried or nested references (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist). It is ~209 lines of inlined methodology and format detail where a separate reference file could carry some material, so it fits good-structure-with-minor-gaps rather than the simple-skill 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |