Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable catalog of behavioral modes with clear sequencing guidance and explicit mode-switch triggers, losing points only for minor padding and the lack of any reference split for the larger inline detail.
Suggestions
Trim the IMPLEMENT "NOT" anti-example and consolidate emoji-heavy output templates to tighten token efficiency.
Add a brief concrete mechanism for switching or persisting mode state across a task (e.g. how MENTAL MODEL SYNC is loaded/saved) to close the actionability gap.
Consider splitting the per-mode output-style templates into a single one-level-deep reference (e.g. MODE-TEMPLATES.md) to improve progressive disclosure for the longer inline detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient mode definitions and templates with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only minor illustrative padding (the IMPLEMENT "NOT" example and emoji output templates) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each mode provides concrete behavior bullets and an output-style template with specific directives (e.g. "Offer multiple alternatives (at least 3)", "Form hypothesis → test → verify"), with only minor gaps around the mechanics of actually switching or persisting mode state. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Combining Modes" table sequences explicit mode chains per flow and includes a checkpoint signal ("drop from IMPLEMENT to DEBUG the moment a test fails"), but these are illustrative flows rather than a single enforced validated workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with clear headers and a navigation/detection table is well-organized, though the ~245-line monolith inlines substantial per-mode detail that is not split into one-level-deep references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |