Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a concrete template and verification checklist; its main weaknesses are minor redundancy with the frontmatter and the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and mostly efficient — templates, tables, and checklists carry the content with little concept-overexplaining; the 'When to Skillify' good/bad list mildly duplicates the frontmatter when_to_use and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready SKILL.md template, a concrete file-placement path, a naming-convention table, and a verification checklist; Step 1's introspection questions are appropriate but leave minor gaps in executable specificity. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step protocol (Identify → Generate → Place → Verify) with an explicit verification checklist; no validate→fix→retry feedback loop, but skill creation is not a destructive or batch operation so the workflow-clarity cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly signaled sections (When, Protocol, Naming, Quality Checklist) and self-contained with no bundle files; slightly over the simple-skill line so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |