CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bikeshed-conversion

Guidelines for converting W3C specs to Bikeshed format. Covers anchor ID preservation, dfn handling, and common pitfalls. Read this before any Bikeshed conversion or migration work.

84

1.30x
Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

98%

1.30x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/bikeshed-conversion/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a lean, well-structured, actionable guide with concrete code, a real ID-pattern table, and a sequenced checklist including verification. Main improvement area is making the verification step a full validate->fix->retry feedback loop.

Suggestions

Turn step 4's verify step into an explicit feedback loop: 'If any anchor fails to resolve, fix the dfn id, rebuild, and re-verify until all original anchors resolve.'

Tighten the overlap between the intro paragraph and 'The Problem' section to recover a few tokens.

Add the exact verification command or a one-line Bikeshed build invocation to the checklist so the verify step is copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is focused on Bikeshed-specific mechanics without explaining basics Claude already knows, but the opening paragraph and 'The Problem' section overlap somewhat, leaving minor instances that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides real, copy-paste-ready BAD/GOOD HTML snippets, a concrete ID-pattern table with actual IDs, and the attribute-keyword fix; minor gaps are the checklist's tool references (xref, grep) without exact commands.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 5-step checklist is clearly sequenced with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 4: build and confirm anchors resolve), but it lacks an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for this spec-manipulation context.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This single-purpose skill (~65 lines) needs no external bundle files and is cleanly organized into well-signaled sections (Problem, Fix, ID Patterns, IDL Attributes, Checklist), satisfying the simple-skill exception for well-organized content with no nested references.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and answers both what and when with an explicit trigger clause, occupying a clear niche. It could be strengthened by enumerating more concrete actions and broadening trigger-term variations to match the comprehensive 5-anchor examples.

Suggestions

List several concrete actions instead of topic areas (e.g., 'preserve anchor IDs, fix dfn handling, scope IDL attribute definitions, migrate cross-spec references') to lift specificity.

Broaden trigger terms with synonyms and the user's natural phrasings (e.g., 'Bikeshed, bikeshedding, W3C spec migration, ReSpec-to-Bikeshed') for fuller keyword coverage.

Expand the when-clause into multiple concrete triggers (e.g., 'Use when converting a W3C spec to Bikeshed, fixing broken cross-spec anchors, or migrating dfn markup').

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (W3C specs to Bikeshed) plus topical sub-areas like 'anchor ID preservation, dfn handling, and common pitfalls', but these are subjects rather than several distinct concrete actions, matching the 1-2-actions-not-comprehensive anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what it does (convert W3C specs to Bikeshed, preserve anchor IDs, dfn handling, pitfalls) and gives an explicit when clause ('Read this before any Bikeshed conversion or migration work'), but the trigger is a single scenario rather than the multi-variation concrete triggers of a 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ('W3C specs', 'Bikeshed', 'conversion', 'migration', 'convert') with good coverage, though it lacks synonyms and file-extension variations that would push it to 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Bikeshed conversion' / 'W3C specs to Bikeshed format' is a narrow, clearly-scoped niche with minimal overlap risk against other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
w3c/web-performance
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.