Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with a clear tiered workflow and validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is mild verbosity in the positioning and integration sections that assumes less of Claude's intelligence than the rubric rewards.
Suggestions
Tighten the Role & Positioning table and Integration sections — the cross-skill distinctions and /research-lit enrichment flow are context Claude can infer, and trimming them improves token efficiency.
Consider moving the research-wiki ingest bash block (Step 6) into a referenced script if it grows further, keeping SKILL.md focused on the lookup workflow.
The Key Rules section partially restates guidance already embedded in the workflow steps; consolidate to avoid repetition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with executable curl commands and tight step descriptions, but the Role & Positioning table and Integration sections add context Claude could largely infer; could be trimmed without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable curl commands with exact URL templates, explicit directives, and a copy-paste-ready wiki-ingest bash block — fully actionable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with tiered fallback (overview → abs → src) and explicit validation/recovery checkpoints (403/404 → escalate, 429 → wait 5s and retry once). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into focused sections with one-level-deep signaling; no bundle files present, and the single external reference to integration-contract.md is clearly labeled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |