Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clear, well-structured single-file workflow with concrete templates and a verification checkpoint, scoring consistently across dimensions. The main gap is the lack of an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for batch figure processing.
Suggestions
Add an explicit retry loop after Step 6: when claim elements are flagged MISSING, loop back to assign/flag numerals and re-verify coverage until no MISSING items remain.
De-duplicate the Reference Numeral Index instructions between Step 5 and the Step 7 output section to reduce token redundancy.
Consider extracting the CN/US drawing-description templates and numeral-index schema into a references/ file to shorten SKILL.md and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and action-oriented without explaining concepts Claude already knows, though the numeral-index table and Step 5/Step 7 output overlap could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete CN/US description templates, an exact numeral-index table schema, and named output files give actionable guidance; it is template/placeholder-based rather than executable code, which is acceptable for an instruction-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven steps are clearly sequenced with a Step 6 cross-reference verification checkpoint and missing-item flagging, but there is no explicit fix-and-revalidate retry loop for the batch figure operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; content is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and no nested references, which is appropriate for a skill of this size though it exceeds the 50-line simple-skill exception. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |