Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a coherent, honest 8-step workflow with strong validation and failure handling, and gives concrete templates and rules that make it easy to execute. Its main weakness is redundancy — the same writing rules and package contents are restated across steps, the template, and Key Rules — plus a missing worked example and an unverifiable cross-skill reference.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated honesty rules: merge Step 7's writing rules, Step 8's verification checklist, and the Key Rules section into one authoritative list to remove 2-3x repetition of the same guidance.
Replace the separate package-content list in Step 7 with a pointer to the Required File Structure template, or move the 40-line template into a references/ file (e.g. references/derivation-template.md) that Step 7 links to.
Add one short worked mini-example in Step 5 or Step 7 showing a formula step labeled as identity/proposition/approximation/interpretation, so the classification scheme is demonstrated rather than only defined.
Verify the ../lean-formalize/SKILL.md link resolves in the deployed bundle, or describe the sibling skill by name only to avoid a dangling relative path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | No filler or explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but there is noticeable redundancy: rules like "do not hide gaps", "mark approximations explicitly", and object-stability warnings each appear two to three times across Step 5, Step 7 writing rules, Step 8, Output Modes, and Key Rules, and the Required File Structure template repeats Step 7's package-content list. The body could be tightened meaningfully. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: a default file constant, a status enum, a file-selection priority order, an exact copy-paste document template, and explicit step-classification categories. Minor gap: no worked mini-example showing a labeled derivation step (identity/proposition/approximation/interpretation) or a sample blocker report. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced steps with an explicit verification checklist (Step 8) and a failure feedback loop ("downgrade the status and write a blocker report instead of forcing a clean story"), a gating rule in Step 2, and three branched output modes for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-sectioned file with no bundle files, but at ~286 lines the 40-line document template is inlined where a reference file could carry it, and the one external link ([../lean-formalize/SKILL.md]) points outside the bundle and cannot be verified to exist in this review context, a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |