Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable multi-phase pipeline with strong validation checkpoints and clean one-level references. It is slightly let down by repetitive philosophical justification in Phase 3 and the absence of bundle files to split the long inline workflow.
Suggestions
Collapse the three repeated 'ANNOTATE, do not eliminate' statements in Phase 3 into a single boxed rationale to tighten conciseness.
Move the Phase 2/Phase 4 reviewer prompt templates and the full report template into ./references/ files and link to them, improving progressive disclosure.
De-duplicate 'Key Rules' against the phase bodies (e.g., compute-cost estimation and broad-direction narrowing are already stated in Phases 3 and 6).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient procedural content, but Phase 3 repeats its 'ANNOTATE, do not eliminate' rationale three times and the 'Key Rules' section overlaps earlier guidance, fitting 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable bash, concrete spawn_agent/send_input blocks, and a copy-paste upsert_idea command, but the brainstorm prompts use [paste landscape map] placeholders that must be filled, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–7 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation (threat-scan gate before injection, GPU-hour estimation, PILOT_TIMEOUT kills) and feedback loops (reduce scale on over-budget, rebuild pack on scanner hit), satisfying the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one level deep (../shared-references/fan-out-pattern.md, injection-hygiene.md, etc.), but the 340-line body keeps all seven phases inline with no bundle files to offload detail, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |