Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validation-rich workflow and strong executable examples. Its weak spots are redundancy in the trailing Key Rules section and the absence of progressive disclosure — large reference blocks are inlined with no separate files.
Suggestions
Move the KaTeX math reference, the academic style guide, and the architecture-diagram best practices into separate reference files (e.g. references/math.md, references/academic-style.md) linked one level deep from SKILL.md.
Remove the 'Key Rules (MUST FOLLOW)' section or collapse it into a short pointer, since it duplicates Steps 3–5 and adds padding.
Drop the decorative ═══ box lines and the odd 'ASCII alias for automated checks' comments to reduce token noise.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with genuinely useful reference tables, but the 'Key Rules (MUST FOLLOW)' section restates steps already covered, the decorative ═══ box lines are pure padding, and repeated MANDATORY/MUST emphasis could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable guidance — mkdir, mmdc verification commands, full junction-routing and attention-mechanism Mermaid examples, and a KaTeX syntax table — with only minor gaps such as the `<diagram-name>` placeholders needing substitution. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation (mmdc syntax check in Step 4), a FIX→re-render→re-review feedback loop bounded by MAX_ITERATIONS, and a detailed review checklist for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers provide reasonable structure, but no bundle files exist and reference-grade content (KaTeX math reference, CVPR/ICLR style guide, architecture best practices) is inlined rather than split into one-level-deep referenced files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |