Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, command-first monitoring workflow with concrete ssh/screen/modal/wandb examples and clearly gated optional steps. The main gaps are the unexecuted Feishu step, implicit rather than explicit validation checkpoints, and inlined W&B API detail that a reference file could absorb.
Suggestions
Make Step 6 actionable: include the actual Feishu API call or payload format, or point to a script/reference that implements it.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before declaring an experiment done (e.g., verify the JSON result file is complete/non-empty and exit status is 0) rather than relying on the prose 'Key Rules'.
Move the wandb API snippets into a reference file and keep only the metric checklist inline to shorten the always-loaded body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is command-driven with almost no concept explanation — every step is a snippet or bullet — matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. Not 5 because the external-cadence blockquote and asides like 'This gives the auto-review-loop richer signal' add tokens that don't change behavior. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps 1–3.5 give copy-paste-ready ssh/screen/wandb-python commands, matching 'concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. Not 5 because Step 6 ('Send experiment_done notification') gives no actual command or payload, and several commands depend on unexplained placeholders like <results_dir>. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 1→6 workflow with condition-gated branches (wandb, modal, feishu) and recovery guidance ('If hardcopy fails, check for log files', 'If results look wrong, check training logs for errors'), fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. Not 5 because validation is advisory prose rather than explicit checkpoints, and no verification exists before the Feishu notification fires. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-sectioned document with no bundle files; structure is good and navigable, matching 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'. Not 5 because the ~45-line W&B API section is detail that could live in a reference file, and the body links ../shared-references/external-cadence.md, a path outside the bundle that cannot be verified from this skill's directory. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |