Two-way sync between a local paper directory and an Overleaf project via the Overleaf Git bridge (Premium feature). Lets you keep ARIS audit/edit workflows on the local copy while collaborators edit in the Overleaf web UI. Token never touches the agent — user does the one-time auth via macOS Keychain. Use when user says "同步 overleaf", "overleaf sync", "推送到 overleaf", "connect overleaf", "Overleaf 桥接", "pull overleaf", "push overleaf", or wants to bridge their ARIS paper directory with an Overleaf project.
89
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Bridge a local paper directory with an Overleaf project so that:
/paper-claim-audit, /citation-audit, /auto-paper-improvement-loop), and push fixes backThis uses the official Overleaf Git bridge (Premium feature). The agent never sees your authentication token — you do the one-time auth manually so the token lives in macOS Keychain, not in chat history or .git/config.
paper-overleaf (sibling of existing paper/, NOT inside paper/)osxkeychain (macOS) / manager (Windows) / cache (Linux fallback)┌─────────────────┐ git pull/push ┌─────────────────┐
│ Local paper/ │ ◄─── rsync ──── ► │ paper-overleaf/ │ ◄──► Overleaf web
│ (ARIS audits) │ │ (git bridge) │ (collaborators)
└─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘The paper-overleaf/ directory is a git clone of the Overleaf project. The paper/ directory is the working copy where ARIS skills run. They are kept in sync via rsync.
Single-source-of-truth rule: at any given time, treat one of them as authoritative for active editing. Switch directions explicitly with pull or push, and run a status check before either to surface unexpected divergence.
setup <project-id> — one-timeSets up the bridge for a new Overleaf project. The user runs this in their own terminal, never through the agent. The skill ships with a hardened setup script that:
pre-commit hook in paper-overleaf/.git/hooks/ that refuses to commit any blob containing the token pattern olp_[A-Za-z0-9]{20,} — a hard technical block, not a behavioral ruleThe agent's only role here is to print the user instruction:
Run this in your own terminal (NOT through me):
bash <ARIS_REPO>/tools/overleaf_setup.sh <project-id-or-url>
When it finishes, tell me "setup done" and I'll verify.After the user reports "setup done", the agent verifies (token-free):
cd paper-overleaf
git remote -v # must show URL WITHOUT token
git config --get credential.helper
git fetch && git log --oneline -3 # must succeed without prompting
ls .git/hooks/pre-commit # must exist
bash <ARIS_REPO>/tools/overleaf_audit.sh . # must report "Audit clean"If paper-overleaf/ exists but is empty (new Overleaf project), the agent then mirrors local paper/ into it (see push workflow).
pull — before each editing sessioncd paper-overleaf && git pull --ff-only
# Show what changed since last pull
LAST=$(git rev-parse HEAD@{1})
git diff --stat $LAST..HEAD
git diff $LAST..HEAD -- 'sec/*.tex' # detailed view for prose changesDiff protocol — DO NOT blindly merge into local paper/. Overleaf edits frequently include:
Lrage for Large)/paper-claim-audit/citation-auditFor each diff hunk, decide one of:
| Hunk character | Action |
|---|---|
| Clean editorial improvement | Sync into paper/, no audit needed |
| Numerical / claim change | Sync, then re-run /paper-claim-audit |
New \cite{...} | Sync, then re-run /citation-audit |
| Half-sentence / obvious typo | Flag to user, do NOT auto-sync |
| New section / restructure | Stop, ask user before syncing |
After deciding per-hunk:
# Sync only the files the user approved into local paper/
rsync -av paper-overleaf/sec/0.abstract.tex paper/sec/0.abstract.tex
# (or use Edit tool for surgical changes that skip half-sentences)push — after local editingUse after ARIS skills have edited paper/ and you want collaborators on Overleaf to see the changes.
# 1. Always pull first to surface remote drift
cd paper-overleaf && git pull --ff-only
# 2. If pull was a no-op, sync local paper → paper-overleaf
rsync -av --delete \
--exclude='.git' --exclude='.DS_Store' \
--exclude='*.aux' --exclude='*.log' --exclude='*.bbl' --exclude='*.blg' \
--exclude='*.fls' --exclude='*.fdb_latexmk' --exclude='*.out' \
--exclude='*.synctex.gz' --exclude='*.toc' \
paper/ paper-overleaf/
# 3. Show what would be pushed
git status --short
git diff --stat
# 4. Commit + push
git add -A
git commit -m "<descriptive message — what ARIS changed and why>"
git pushCommit message protocol: include the ARIS skill that produced the change so collaborators on Overleaf understand provenance. Examples:
paper-write: regenerated sec/3.assurance after audit cascade refactorcitation-audit: fix 14 metadata entries (madaan2023, lee2024, ...)paper-claim-audit: correct sec/5 numbers vs results/run_2026_04_19.jsonConfirmation gate: push writes to a shared resource. ALWAYS show the user git diff --stat (and a representative hunk for prose changes) before running git push. Wait for explicit confirmation unless the user said auto: true upfront.
status — diagnosticcd paper-overleaf
git fetch
echo "=== Remote-vs-local divergence ==="
git log --oneline HEAD..origin/master # remote ahead
git log --oneline origin/master..HEAD # local ahead
echo "=== paper/ vs paper-overleaf/ divergence ==="
diff -rq --brief paper/ paper-overleaf/ 2>/dev/null \
| grep -v "Only in paper/.*\.\(aux\|log\|out\|fls\|fdb_latexmk\|bbl\|blg\|synctex\|toc\)" \
| grep -v "Only in paper-overleaf/.git" \
| grep -v "DS_Store"Three-way state assessment:
| Remote ahead? | paper/ vs paper-overleaf/ differ? | Meaning | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | No | Clean | Nothing to do |
| Yes | No | Overleaf has new edits | Run pull, then re-run status |
| No | Yes | Local ARIS edits unsynced | Run push |
| Yes | Yes | Diverged — needs merge | Stop, surface to user, do NOT auto-resolve |
If git pull --ff-only fails because of true divergence:
git pull (which would auto-merge).git reset --hard or git push --force (destructive).git log origin/master ^HEAD (their Overleaf commits) and git log HEAD ^origin/master (local ARIS commits).Behavioral rules alone are not enough — the next agent reading this skill might forget them. The skill therefore relies on technical guards that hold even if the agent misbehaves:
| Layer | Guard | Where enforced |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Setup | overleaf_setup.sh refuses to run without an interactive TTY (agents don't have one) | tools/overleaf_setup.sh |
| 2. Input | Token is read by read -s (hidden prompt, no shell history, never enters chat) | tools/overleaf_setup.sh |
| 3. Storage | Token goes straight into OS keychain via git credential approve; remote URL is stripped to a token-free form | tools/overleaf_setup.sh |
| 4. Commits | paper-overleaf/.git/hooks/pre-commit greps staged content for olp_[A-Za-z0-9]{20,} and aborts | auto-installed by setup script |
| 5. Audit | overleaf_audit.sh scans working tree, remote URLs, git history, credential files | tools/overleaf_audit.sh |
Behavioral rules (still apply, but secondary):
.env, .netrc, tools/*.sh, etc.) committed to any repo.git remote -v URL — strip it after clone.401 Unauthorized from push/pull, tell the user the keychain entry expired and to re-run overleaf_setup.sh. Do not ask for a fresh token.The single biggest source of pain in two-way sync is simultaneous editing on both sides.
paper/ until the user runs /overleaf-sync pull./auto-paper-improvement-loop or /paper-write, the user should pause Overleaf editing until the loop finishes and /overleaf-sync push is run.When in doubt, run status first.
paper-overleaf/ directory at repo root, git clone of Overleaf project (origin URL has NO token)paper/ directory unchanged in role — still the ARIS working copypull/push operation: a one-line summary back to the user (commits pulled / pushed, file count, link to Overleaf project URL)/paper-claim-audit — re-run after pulling Overleaf changes that touch numbers/citation-audit — re-run after pulling Overleaf changes that add/edit \cite{...}/paper-compile — local LaTeX build; Overleaf compiles independently in the cloud2028ac4
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.