Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced orchestration skill with strong validation gates, weakened mainly by length and rationale prose that could be split into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the Phase 1.5 contract negotiation, Phase 6.0 assurance/verifier resolution, and the 'Empirical motivation' rationale blocks into referenced files (e.g. acceptance-contract.md, assurance-gate.md) to lift progressive_disclosure and reduce conciseness cost.
Trim editorial rationale paragraphs ('Why this is the most diagnostic...', 'Empirical motivation') to one-line pointers or move them to the referenced audit SKILL.md files, keeping SKILL.md to operational guidance only.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operationally dense and mostly efficient, but ~690 lines include rationale prose ('Empirical motivation', 'Why this is the most diagnostic of the four audit layers') and repeated assurance-derivation blocks that could be tightened, so it does not reach the lean/efficient anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: concrete slash commands per phase, real bash with exit-code handling, file paths, and named JSON artifacts — copy-paste ready and matching the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–6 are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints, a submission pre-flight checklist, verifier gates with exit-code remediation, and review→fix→recompile feedback loops, satisfying the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to ../shared-references/*.md are well signaled and one level deep, but the SKILL.md itself is a monolithic ~690-line wall with inline contract/verifier detail that belongs in separate files, and no bundle files exist to offload it. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |