Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The workflow is exceptionally well-engineered — explicit sequencing, mandatory verification gates, graceful-degradation fallbacks, and checklists — but the body is roughly three times longer than it needs to be: duplicated resolver boilerplate, twice-stated D2 policy, and design-space justification that belongs in a reference document. Referenced shared-references files are not part of the bundle, so progressive disclosure is only partially realized.
Suggestions
Factor the ~15-line fetcher/ARIS_REPO resolver into one shared snippet (or a helper script in scripts/) and reference it from each source block instead of repeating it six times; this alone would cut hundreds of tokens.
Move the D2 policy rationale, the fan-out/acceptance-gate justification in Step 2, and the per-source de-duplication rules into a references/ file (e.g. sources-and-dedup.md) linked once, and state each rule once instead of "both lines must stay in sync" dual restatements.
Replace placeholder-heavy blocks with one concrete worked example (a real query and arXiv ID), and name the most common Zotero/Obsidian MCP tool patterns in Step 0a/0b instead of "e.g., search".
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~750-line body repeats the identical ARIS_REPO/`$ARXIV_FETCHER` resolver boilerplate six times, restates the D2 policy twice ("the finalization block below restates this rule canonically — both lines must stay in sync"), and spends long passages on internal design rationale ("Policy D2", "cross-model-family rule", Tier 1/2/3 fan-out justifications) the executor does not need — noticeably verbose with several padded sections. Not 1, because it never teaches concepts Claude already knows (no "what is a PDF" material) and the verbosity is duplication and policy meta-commentary rather than pure abstraction. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: complete, wrapped bash blocks with `set -e` guards, concrete WebSearch/de-dup rules, an MCP call with the full Gemini prompt, and a fallback python heredoc. Gaps keep it from 5: `QUERY`, `ARXIV_ID`, and the candidate-papers JSON are placeholders rather than copy-paste-ready, and the Zotero/Obsidian steps say only "try calling a Zotero MCP tool (e.g., search)" without concrete tool names. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are explicitly sequenced (0a → 0b → 0c → 1 → 1.5 → 2 → 6) with validation checkpoints throughout: the mandatory Step 1.5 anti-hallucination verify gate with fallback, the D2 empty-aggregate error-and-stop gate, per-source warn-and-continue feedback loops, an explicit wiki-ingest checklist, and retry guidance for network errors — matching the anchor "clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists". | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections and headers exist and there are clearly-signaled links to `shared-references/integration-contract.md`, `citation-discipline.md`, `fan-out-pattern.md`, `output-composition.md`, and `wiki-helper-resolution.md`, but none of those files exist in the skill bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and the resolver boilerplate, D2 policy prose, and per-source de-duplication rules — content that clearly belongs in a separate reference file — are inlined and repeated. This fits "some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline"; not 4 because the referenced paths are unverifiable/absent and the bulk stays monolithic. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |