Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow for orchestrating a Gemini-based research review, with clear sequencing and concrete MCP tooling. Its main weakness is the absence of any progressive disclosure via separate bundle files, keeping detailed templates inlined.
Suggestions
Move the Prompt Templates block into a referenced file (e.g. references/prompts.md) and link to it from the workflow, so SKILL.md stays a lean overview and earns a higher progressive_disclosure score.
Tighten the 'Key Rules' section by removing items already implied by the workflow steps (e.g. 'Send comprehensive context in Round 1' restates Step 1), improving conciseness.
Add an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint for failed or empty review_status responses (e.g. 'if status returns an error, re-invoke review_start with trimmed context') to push workflow_clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete MCP tool calls and prompt fragments rather than conceptual explanation, but the 'Key Rules' section partially restates points already implied by the workflow steps and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, named MCP tools (review_start, review_reply_start, review_status) with a real registration command and copy-paste-ready prompt templates; the Round 1 prompt template is a labeled block rather than fully literal copy-paste and the polling invocation is described in prose rather than shown as a call, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit polling loop and convergence criteria, and includes a verification checkpoint ('poll until done=true'); it stops short of a 5 because there is no explicit validation/feedback-loop for malformed responses or failures during the iterative rounds. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is reasonably organized with section headers, but there are no bundle files and the prompt templates plus key rules are all inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into referenced files, so there is no one-level-deep reference structure to navigate. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |