CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

result-to-claim

Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.

67

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Low

Low-risk findings.

1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.

Low

W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).

What this means

The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.

Why it was flagged

Step 1.5/Step 2 ingests evidence into the Codex prompt from potentially outsider-authored sources (e.g., W&B run history, log files, and legacy docs like `docs/research_contract.md`), and then Step 2 feeds that free-form text/metrics into the LLM context via the `mcp__codex__codex` prompt template.

Report incorrect finding
Repository
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
Audited
Security analysis
Snyk

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.