Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, fully executable preflight workflow with explicit sequencing, validation checkpoints, and error-recovery feedback loops. Its only weaknesses are a minor duplicated sharding explanation and long inlined package lists that could be split into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean commands with terse explanations and assumes Claude's competence (no preamble on what yarn/eslint/vitest are), but the test-counting/sharding rule is stated twice (Important section and step 11), a minor redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands (yarn, node scripts, rg/awk pipelines) with concrete pass/fail criteria like 'Must output "All dependencies in order!" to pass'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Thirteen steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (duplicates.json empty, adio output, dist paths, uncommitted changes) and a feedback loop ('If any step fails... restart from step 1') for this batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Important, Steps, Keeping lists up to date) with no nested references, but the long inlined package lists are data that could arguably live in a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |