Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, actionable catalog with clear usage steps and copy-paste imports, scoring strongly on conciseness, actionability, and workflow clarity. Its only weakness is progressive disclosure: a large monolithic inline listing with no external reference files to offload subdomain detail.
Suggestions
Split the catalog into per-subdomain reference files (e.g. references/lexical.md, references/entry-editor.md, references/model.md, references/field-renderers.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links.
Add short section headers grouping the abstractions by subdomain so the single file is easier to navigate even before splitting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean catalog of terse Name/Kind/Import/Source entries with a tight 3-step usage header and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Each entry provides a copy-paste-ready import statement and an exact source file path, and the usage steps direct the reader to read the source for types, giving concrete executable guidance rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The "How to Use" section is a clear, unambiguous 3-step sequence (find abstraction, read source for types, import); this is a non-destructive lookup task so no validation checkpoint is required, and the simple-skill allowance applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is a ~470-line monolithic inline catalog with consistent separators and well-organized fields, but no bundle files exist and the catalog could be split by subdomain (entry/editor, lexical, model, field-renderers), matching the well-organized-but-inline anchor rather than the split-with-navigation anchor at 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |