CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

webiny-admin-languages-catalog

admin/languages — 2 abstractions.

52

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/user-skills/generated/admin/languages/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured abstraction catalog: a 3-step usage workflow with a mandatory read-the-source checkpoint, followed by two entries giving exact import statements and source paths. Its main weakness is thin actionability — no usage example for the hook, deferring entirely to source files — and a 'How to Use' step that offers no selection guidance beyond scanning the two entries.

Suggestions

Add a one-line usage example for 'useLanguages' (e.g. the shape it returns or a minimal hook call) so the most common case does not require opening the source file.

Add a sentence per abstraction (what it is for) so step 1 ('Find the abstraction you need') has selection guidance other than reading both sources.

State the module context at the top (Webiny admin) so the catalog is self-contained when the source tree is not open.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~25-line body is a lean lookup table: a 3-step usage list and two abstraction entries with name, kind, import, and source path. No padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line carries information. This matches the anchor 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place.'

5 / 5

Actionability

Import statements are copy-paste ready and exact source file paths are given, which is executable guidance for a catalog skill. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no usage example for 'useLanguages' (what it returns, its loading/error state) — the reader is told to read the source instead — leaving a minor gap for the most common case.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

'How to Use' gives a coherent 3-step sequence (find abstraction, read source for exact interface, import) with an explicit MUST checkpoint before use. It is not a destructive or batch operation, so no validation is required; it sits at anchor 4 (clear sequence, minor gaps) rather than 5 because step 1 ('Find the abstraction you need below') gives no selection guidance and nothing covers how to consume the hook after import.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external reference files (none exist in the bundle), and is organized into clean 'How to Use' and 'Abstractions' sections. Its only pointers are one-level-deep, clearly labeled 'Source' paths into the codebase, so per the simple-skill guidance it matches the top anchor: well-organized sections, easy navigation, no buried or nested references.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

28%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a bare catalog label: it names the module and a count of abstractions but says nothing about what the skill does or when to use it. It fails the rubric's core requirements of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger and a statement of concrete capabilities. The only redeeming quality is that it names a specific, non-generic domain.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when working with Webiny admin language management, multi-language setup, locales, or i18n in the admin area.'

State the capability concretely instead of counting abstractions, e.g. 'Catalog of Webiny admin language abstractions: the LanguageDto type and the useLanguages hook, with import paths and source file locations.'

Include natural trigger terms users would say (languages, locales, i18n, multilingual) and mention the Webiny context so it does not collide with generic i18n skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description only names the domain ("admin/languages") and a count ("2 abstractions") — it lists zero concrete actions or capabilities. It sits between the entirely-vague anchor (1) and the domain-plus-minimal-actions anchor (3), matching anchor 2: domain named, actions minimal.

2 / 5

Completeness

There is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3, and the 'what' itself is only vaguely implied (a count of abstractions, not what the skill does with them). Per the anchor for a vague 'what' with no 'when', this scores 2.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Only "admin", "languages", and "abstractions" appear — internal jargon rather than natural user phrases like "i18n", "locale", "multi-language", or "translate". This matches anchor 2 (one or two generic keywords, missing the natural phrases users would actually say).

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"admin/languages" is scoped to a specific Webiny module, giving it a niche, but the bare word "languages" overlaps with i18n, localization, and translation skills, and no distinct triggers are provided. This matches anchor 3 (somewhat specific, could still overlap with similar skills) rather than 4, which would require minor overlap risk with closely related skills only.

3 / 5

Total

9

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
webiny/webiny-js
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.