Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-formed, uniform lookup catalog with a clear usage procedure and precise import/source data, which makes it actionable. Its main weaknesses are the inlining of the entire 65-entry catalog in SKILL.md instead of splitting it into reference files, systematic repetition of import paths that inflates token cost, and sparse per-entry descriptions.
Suggestions
Move the abstraction catalog out of SKILL.md into references/ split by module (e.g. references/page-editor.md, references/lexical.md, references/root.md), leaving SKILL.md as an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep links.
Group entries under module headings and state each import path once per group instead of repeating 'import { X } from "path"' and 'Source:' on all 65 entries, cutting the catalog's token footprint roughly in half.
Add a one-line behavioral Description to every entry (currently only ~6 of 65 have one), as the existing entries like $previewElementInputs demonstrate, so the model can select the right abstraction without reading every source file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The catalog avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but each of the 65 entries repeats an 'Import:' line whose module path is shared by many entries (e.g. 'webiny/admin/website-builder/page/editor' appears ~30 times) plus a 'Source:' line, so ~400 lines could be compressed substantially by grouping entries under module headings. Anchor 3 ('mostly efficient but could be tightened') fits; not 4 because the redundancy is systematic rather than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Entries give exact copy-paste import statements and exact source file paths, and the instructions ('You MUST read the source file to get the exact interface and types') are concrete and executable. This matches anchor 4 ('mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps') — the gap being that only ~6 of 65 entries carry a Description, so most entries give no behavioral hint; not 5 because common usage patterns are not covered. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'How to Use' lays out an unambiguous 3-step sequence (find the abstraction, read its source for exact types, import it), with the mandatory read-source step acting as a checkpoint. This is a simple lookup skill with no destructive or batch operations, so anchor 4 ('clear sequence with most checkpoints present') applies; not 5 because the file exceeds the simple-skill (<50 line) exception and no verification of the resolved API is suggested. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Roughly 90% of the body is a ~400-line API catalog inlined directly in SKILL.md with no references/ directory at all — matching anchor 2's example ('300 lines of API reference that should be in a separate file'). It is not a 1 because the file has a coherent 'How to Use' header and a uniform per-entry structure, but it is below 3 since the catalog clearly belongs in separate per-module reference files. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |