Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an admirably lean, uniformly structured catalog with copy-paste import statements and mandatory source-reading guidance, and the usage workflow is clear. Its main weaknesses are the wholesale inlining of a long API reference that belongs in a bundle file and the absence of any example or selection guidance for actually using these abstractions.
Suggestions
Move the 32-entry abstraction catalog into a references/ file (e.g. references/abstractions.md) and keep a short grouped index in SKILL.md, linking to it explicitly.
Add one minimal inline example of registering a folder event handler or invoking a use case so the common implementation case is covered without consulting other skills.
Group or annotate the abstractions by kind (use cases, repositories, event handlers, types) so readers can pick the right abstraction without reading every source file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean lookup table: no concept explanations, no padding, just a 4-step usage note and uniform Name/Import/Source/Description entries where every token (the import statement, the source path, the one-line purpose) earns its place. Matches anchor 5 (lean, assumes competence). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Every entry ships a copy-paste-ready import statement and an exact source file to read, and step 2 mandates reading the source — but no example covers the common case of actually implementing a handler or use case, which is deferred to the external 'webiny-use-case-pattern' / 'webiny-event-handler-pattern' skills. Matches anchor 4 (mostly executable, minor gaps), not 5, because common usage cases are not covered inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to Use' sequence (find abstraction → MUST read source → import → see pattern skills) is clearly ordered, but there is no guidance on choosing between the repository, use-case, and event-handler abstraction kinds, and no checkpoints for verifying the right abstraction was picked. Anchor 4 (clear sequence, minor gaps) fits better than 5, whose feedback loops and checklists are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent), and a 32-entry API reference of ~240 lines is inlined wholesale in SKILL.md — content that clearly belongs in a separate reference file. It has section headers and a uniform entry structure, so it sits at anchor 3 (some structure, but content that should be separate is inline) rather than 2's headerless wall or 4's appropriate split. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |