Conciseness

The body is a lean catalog — each entry is exactly name, copy-paste import statement, source path, and a one-line description, with no padding and no explanation of GraphQL or Webiny concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching the anchor-5 'lean and efficient' example.

Actionability

Each entry gives a literal copy-paste import ('import { Response } from "webiny/api/graphql"') and an exact source file path, plus a directive to read the source for exact types — mostly executable guidance with concrete commands. It falls short of anchor 5 only because there is no usage example (e.g. how to construct and return a Response in a resolver), leaving the most common case partly to the referenced source files.

Workflow Clarity

The 'How to Use' section lays out an unambiguous 4-step sequence (find the abstraction → read its source for exact types → import it → consult the named pattern skills), and per the rubric's simple-skill guidance a single-purpose lookup skill with one unambiguous action can score 5. No validation checkpoints are needed since the skill involves no destructive or batch operations.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, which per the rubric guideline scores 5 with well-organized sections alone. The body is cleanly sectioned ('How to Use' vs the per-abstraction catalog), all in-body references point to real named skills rather than nested files, and deep detail is correctly deferred to the cited source files — references are one level deep and clearly signaled.

Specificity

The description is 'api/graphql — 7 abstractions.' — it names the domain (api/graphql) and a count of items, but contains no action verbs or concrete capabilities whatsoever. It matches anchor 2 ('Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic') more than anchor 1 only because the domain is named and quantified; it is not entirely generic language like 'Helps with documents'.

Completeness

The 'what' is extremely vague ('7 abstractions' does not say what is done with them — it's a catalog, not a capability statement) and there is no 'when' clause at all, matching anchor 2 ('Has a vague what and no when'). Per the guideline, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 3, and this sits below that cap because the 'what' itself is barely stated.

Trigger Term Quality

The only terms present are the technical path 'api/graphql' and the jargon word 'abstractions'; 'GraphQL' itself is a term users naturally say, which lifts it above anchor 1, but common natural phrases like 'Webiny', 'GraphQL response', 'not found response', or 'GraphQL schema' are all missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The word 'Webiny' never appears, so 'api/graphql — 7 abstractions' could plausibly match any GraphQL-related skill in a Webiny or non-Webiny project — very broad with high overlap risk against sibling catalog skills (e.g. an api/http or api/graphql-security catalog would trigger similarly), matching anchor 2 rather than anchor 3's 'somewhat specific' framing.