Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clean, well-structured catalog entry with a clear usage workflow and a concrete Logger reference. Its main weakness is actionability: it leans on a placeholder import template and pushes the reader to the source file for the actual interface.
Suggestions
Inline the Logger interface/signature instead of only pointing to the source file, or include a minimal usage example call.
Resolve the '<importPath>' and '{ Name }' placeholders in the generic template by referencing the concrete entry below it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a short numbered workflow plus a single concrete abstraction entry, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, earning its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete import line and source path for Logger, but the generic template 'import { Name } from "<importPath>"' uses placeholders and explicitly defers the interface/types to the source file, leaving guidance incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step 'How to Use' sequence is clear and unambiguous for this simple single-purpose catalog skill, which the rubric allows to score 3 without validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers (source file path and sibling pattern skills), satisfying the simple-skill allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |