Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured abstraction catalog with concrete import lines and source pointers. Its main gaps are the absence of any usage example and an unresolved instruction to 'read the source file' without stating where those files live.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, data-dense catalog: a 4-step usage section plus ten 3-line entries (Name/Import/Source) with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each entry gives a copy-paste-ready import statement and a concrete source path, which is mostly executable guidance; minor gaps keep it below 5 — no usage example and step 2's 'read the source file' does not say where the '@webiny/...' paths resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (find abstraction → read source → import → consult pattern skills) is clear and unambiguous for this simple, non-destructive lookup task. It falls between anchors 4 and 5: no validation is needed, but the 'read the source' step leaves a minor gap about locating the referenced files, so 4 fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a compact inline catalog and clearly signaled one-level references to sibling pattern skills; no bundle files exist to verify. It falls just short of anchor 5 because the ten catalog entries could plausibly live in a separate reference file and navigation between them relies on visual scanning rather than a structured index. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |