Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured reference for the permission pattern, undermined by duplicated use-case boilerplate, a lack of verification feedback loops around destructive operations, and a monolithic single-file structure with no external reference split.
Suggestions
Collapse the five Get/List/Update/Delete/Publish use-case blocks into one parameterized skeleton plus a short per-case delta table to remove duplicated DI-constructor boilerplate.
Add an explicit validate/retry checkpoint after the fetch+check steps in the Delete (and other destructive) workflows so authorization failure is handled as a feedback loop, not just an early return.
Split the test-matrix and admin-side matching sections into referenced files (e.g. TESTS.md, ADMIN-MATCHING.md) so SKILL.md stays a concise overview with one-level-deep references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is well organized and assumes competence, but five near-identical use-case blocks (Get/List/Update/Delete/Publish) duplicate DI-constructor boilerplate and the schema-fields table pushes toward reference-manual density — 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. Not a 3 because the repetition across use cases could be collapsed into a shared skeleton. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable TypeScript with exact import paths, typed signatures, and a method reference table spelling out concrete semantics (e.g. 'canDelete with own:true + no item -> RETURNS FALSE'), which is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clearly numbered and CRITICAL gotchas are flagged, but destructive workflows (delete) rely on authorization gates rather than explicit validate/fix/retry feedback loops — 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'. Not a 3 because no verification checkpoint is given after the fetch/check, and not a 1 because the step order is explicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent) and the body is a single ~373-line file with everything inline, including material (test matrices, admin-side matching) that could be split out — 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'. Not a 3 because there are no one-level-deep external references to defer detail to. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |