Name: webiny-api-scheduler-catalog
Rating: 49.6 (1 reviews)
Author: webiny

Blog Docs Log inGet started

webiny-api-scheduler-catalog

API — Scheduler — 15 abstractions. Scheduled action use cases.

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/user-skills/generated/api/scheduler/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an efficient, well-formatted abstraction catalog with exact import statements and source paths, and a clear lookup workflow. Its weaknesses are the inlining of the full API reference in SKILL.md with no progressive-disclosure bundle, and the absence of any usage example showing how a listed use case is actually invoked.

Suggestions

Add a minimal usage snippet for one representative use case (e.g. instantiating ScheduleActionUseCase and calling execute) so the 'read the source' step has a concrete shape.

Move per-entry detail into a references/ file (e.g. references/abstractions.md) and keep SKILL.md as a categorized index, improving progressive disclosure and token cost on load.

Give the four bare type entries (IScheduledAction, IScheduledActionEntry, ScheduledActionType, ScheduleActionError) one-line descriptions so no entry requires a source-file read just to know its purpose.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is a lean catalog: every entry is exactly Name/Kind/Import/Source/Description with no padding, no concept explanations Claude already knows, and a 4-line usage section. It matches 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'.	5 / 5
Actionability	Each entry supplies a copy-paste-ready import statement and a source path, and the How to Use section gives concrete steps ('import { Name } from "<importPath>"', pointers to pattern skills). It falls short of 5 because no example shows how to actually instantiate or execute a use case (e.g. constructor params, .execute() call), and 4 of the entries (the type exports) have no description at all.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	'How to Use' gives a clear ordered sequence — find the abstraction, read the source file for exact types, import it, then consult the named pattern skills — which is unambiguous for a lookup/catalog skill. Not 5 because there is no guidance on what to do after importing (wiring, registration, error handling), leaving a minor gap.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The catalog has consistent structure and one-level-deep pointers to two pattern skills, but the entire 15-entry API reference is inlined in SKILL.md with no bundle files to offload detail (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist). This matches 'Some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline' rather than 4, which expects bulk detail moved to separate files.	3 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

28%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is essentially a terse label: it identifies the domain and entry count but provides no concrete actions, no natural trigger terms, and no 'when to use' guidance. A user or Claude matching this skill against a request would have little to go on beyond the word 'Scheduler'.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when building scheduled publish/unpublish, delayed CMS actions, or Webiny scheduler features'.

List 2-3 concrete capabilities instead of the abstraction count, e.g. 'Schedule, cancel, list, and execute scheduled actions (publish/unpublish) in Webiny projects'.

Include natural synonyms users would say — 'scheduled publish', 'delayed action', 'cron-like publishing' — to improve trigger matching and distinguish it from generic job-scheduler skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ("API — Scheduler", "Scheduled action use cases") and counts the abstractions ("15 abstractions"), but lists no concrete actions such as scheduling, canceling, or listing actions. It fits the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' and not the level-3 anchor, which requires 1-2 concrete named actions.	2 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is vague ("15 abstractions. Scheduled action use cases.") and there is no 'when' / 'Use when...' guidance at all. Per the guideline that a missing trigger clause caps completeness at 3, and matching the anchor 'Has a vague what and no when', this sits at 2 — not 1, because the domain is at least named.	2 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Only technical jargon ("abstractions", "API") plus one domain keyword ("Scheduler" / "scheduled action") is present; natural phrases a user would say (e.g. 'schedule a publish', 'cancel a scheduled action', 'scheduled CMS publishing') are missing. This matches 'One or two generic keywords; missing the natural phrases users say' rather than level 3, which expects a fuller set of relevant keywords.	2 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	"API — Scheduler" pins a specific module niche, but the bare term 'Scheduler' overlaps with other scheduling/cron/job skills, so it could trigger for the wrong skill. 'Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills' fits; it lacks the clear trigger phrases needed for 4 or 5.	3 / 5
	Total	9 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: webiny/webiny-js
Path: skills/user-skills/generated/api/scheduler/SKILL.md
Commit: f0d3d3e

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.