Mostly dense code/tables with no generic-concept padding, but repetition could be tightened — e.g., five near-identical '.context()' examples (sibling, nested, deep nesting, both, reading in renderer) and a slug-computation example repeated across computed/context sections; not score 3 because some illustrative repetition is unnecessary, not score 1 because it does not explain concepts Claude already knows.

Abundant copy-paste-ready TypeScript ('fields.text().label("Title")...required("Title is required")', 'layout.row("firstName","lastName")', 'form.addRule(z.object({...}).refine(...))') plus exact method/renderer/operator tables; fully executable rather than pseudocode, matching the 'copy-paste ready' anchor.

Content is organized by topic (fields, renderers, layout, validation) but there is no sequenced end-to-end 'build a form' workflow or validation checkpoints; a reader must synthesize the order. Not score 1 because sections are coherent and the submit/validation API is documented, not score 3 because no explicit sequenced process with checkpoints is given.

A single ~770-line monolithic SKILL.md with clear headings but no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent); the field-types, renderers, layout, and validation references are inline material that could be split into separate files. Not score 1 because organization/sections are clear with no nested references, not score 3 because the far-over-50-lines reference is not split across signaled one-level-deep files.

Lists many concrete actions — 'define form fields with the builder API, choose renderers, build layouts with tabs/rows/separators, add validation (Zod or imperative), use conditional visibility/disable rules, create computed fields, or work with object fields and templates' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor; not score 2 because it is comprehensive rather than naming only some actions.

Explicitly answers both: what ('Building forms with the FormModel system — field types, renderers, layout, validation, conditional rules, computed fields, and dynamic zones') and when ('Use this skill when the developer needs to...'); the explicit 'Use this skill when' trigger keeps it at 3 rather than 2.

Natural developer phrasing is well covered — 'forms', 'form fields', 'validation', 'computed fields', 'conditional visibility/disable', 'layout', 'tabs/rows/separators' — terms a user would actually say; not score 2 because common variations are present rather than only some relevant keywords.

Clear niche ('FormModel system', 'builder API', 'dynamic zones') tied to a specific framework, making mis-triggering unlikely; not score 2 because the triggers are specific enough to avoid overlap with generic form/code skills.