Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an actionable, well-structured pattern reference with executable examples and mandatory verification steps. Trimming the import-listing block and adding an explicit error-recovery loop would push conciseness and workflow clarity to full marks.
Suggestions
Condense the 'Common CMS Use Cases for Repositories' import block into a compact table or a single grouped import statement to improve conciseness.
Add a short numbered feedback loop for repository/use-case failure (e.g., on isFail -> inspect error.code -> wrap in domain error -> re-emit) to strengthen workflow clarity.
De-duplicate the repeated 'Export as default' rule across sections into one consolidated 'Registration & Export' rule block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, code-heavy, and largely assumes Claude's competence; mostly lean with every section earning its place. Sits at 4 rather than 5 because the long CMS-import listing block and some repeated 'Rules' bullets could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides multiple complete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript examples (UseCase, repository, decorator, mapper, errors, abstractions, registration) covering the common cases, each paired with explicit rules. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequenced guidance (resolve model first, check isFail, wrap errors, singleton scope) plus a mandatory 'Resolving Types' verification checkpoint; not a 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop in numbered-workflow form. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single, well-organized SKILL.md with clearly labeled sections and pointers to related skills; no in-repo reference files are needed, so the simple-skill allowance for clean structure yields a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |