Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally actionable, well-sequenced procedure with strong validation checkpoints and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure. Its only weakness is minor repetition and inline version-number detail that could be consolidated into the compatibility reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, imperative, and free of concept padding, but guidance is repeated (consequentialHint/debugging annotations appear in both Step 3 and Step 5; the await registerTool behavior is restated in Error Handling) and many exact Chrome build numbers are inlined rather than consolidated into the compatibility reference. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready feature-detection snippet (document.modelContext || navigator.modelContext), a concrete inventory command, exact tool-name constraints, and per-error-type remedies (InvalidStateError → duplicate names; NotAllowedError → Permissions Policy) cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with a dedicated validation step (lifecycle, invalid-input, cancellation, and annotation audits), an explicit build/typecheck/test checkpoint, and an Error Handling section providing diagnose-and-fix feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an operational overview; four references, one asset template, and one script are each one level deep, clearly signaled with conditional 'Read X when Y' triggers, and all referenced bundle files exist. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |