Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-organized read-only exploration skill built almost entirely from executable commands and example outputs. Its main weaknesses are moderate command repetition between the early sections and the 'Programmatic Answers' section, and limited use of reference files for the longer JSON examples.
Suggestions
Deduplicate commands between 'Listing Projects'/'Project Configuration' and the 'Programmatic Answers' section — keep one canonical set of commands and use the latter only for the example JSON outputs that add new information.
Move the large example JSON output blocks (project details, project graph) into a references/ file (e.g. references/EXAMPLES.md) and link to it, leaving only the key command patterns inline to improve progressive disclosure.
Add a brief explicit verification hint for the project-graph dependents query (e.g. note that an empty result means nothing depends on the library) to strengthen the workflow feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean command/example pairs with no concept explanations, but the 'Programmatic Answers' section re-covers several commands already shown above (e.g. `nx show projects --json`, `nx show project my-app --json | jq '.targets | keys'`), which is minor redundancy that could be trimmed; not lean enough for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully copy-paste-ready executable commands throughout (nx show projects, nx show project --json | jq, nx graph --print) covering the common exploration cases, with concrete example JSON outputs showing what to expect. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Exploration is framed as clear question-patterns ('What's in this workspace?', 'How do I build/test/lint project X?', 'What depends on library Y?') with exact commands, and troubleshooting has a light feedback loop ('nx sync' then 'nx reset # if sync doesn't fix stale cache'); read-only so the destructive-cap doesn't apply, but no explicit validation checkpoints keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear section structure with one well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/AFFECTED.md, verified to exist and linked from the body); however only one reference file exists and a fair amount of detailed inline content (full project/project-detail/graph JSON example blocks) could arguably be split out, so it stops short of the anchor-5 ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |