Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and complete SQL examples, a clear intent-driven workflow with explicit validation and feedback loops, and well-organized self-contained sections. Its main weakness is conciseness: several prose passages over-qualify edge cases in long run-on sentences that could be tightened.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with commands and executable examples and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but several prose passages (notably the metadata-sync paragraph) are long run-on sentences with heavy edge-case qualification that could be tightened, matching 'mostly efficient but could be tightened.' | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable wmill commands with flags and concrete, copy-paste-ready SQL examples for @name parameters, S3Object ingestion via JSON_EXTRACT_ARRAY/JSON_VALUE, and a -- s3 streaming directive, matching 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready.' | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | It sequences a clear intent-driven decision flow (preview vs run vs sync push) with explicit validation checkpoints — diff regenerated locks, report dependency version bumps before deploying, and --dry-run to preview stale items — including a feedback loop for error recovery, matching 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops.' | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files present, the single-purpose skill is organized into clear, well-signaled sections and one-level-deep external pointers (AGENTS.wmill.md, the preview skill), so it scores 3 per the simple-skill guideline for well-organized, self-contained content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |