Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable skill: executable Go examples and specific wmill commands with intent-driven decision rules and useful validation checkpoints. It is concise and well-structured, with only minor trim and organization opportunities.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence, giving operational commands and Go patterns without explaining basics; only a few explanatory passages (e.g. the metadata-sync defaults) could be trimmed, matching the efficient-with-minor-trim anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready Go code (package inner, main signature, struct returns, error handling) and specific wmill CLI commands covering the common cases, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The write → preview/run → generate-metadata → deploy flow is sequenced with intent-based decision rules and checkpoints (--dry-run, lock diffing, version-bump reporting), with only minor gaps in a formal validate-fix-retry loop, matching the clear-sequence-with-most-checkpoints anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized under clear headers (CLI Commands, Go: Structure/Return Types/Error Handling) with signaled external pointers (AGENTS.wmill.md, the preview skill); the two-topic split and ~109-line length leave minor organization gaps versus a clean one-level reference structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |