Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable skill body with an explicit phased workflow, real validation checkpoints, and well-organized one-level-deep references. Its main weakness is modest duplication between inline tables/examples and the bundled reference files, which lightly hurts conciseness and the cleanliness of the progressive disclosure split.
Suggestions
Trim the inline 自然表达替换参考 list and the Gate-A before/after examples that duplicate references/anti-ai-writing.md, replacing them with a one-line pointer to keep the overview lean.
Consider moving the dense agent-compatibility / agents_version notice block into a short reference note, since it is operational plumbing rather than core deslop guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient and dense with specialized craft knowledge Claude would not already know (the Gate system, deletion-priority logic, tier limits), but some content — the 自然表达替换参考 list and several Gate-A before/after examples — duplicates material already in references/anti-ai-writing.md, and the agent-compatibility block is heavy operational overhead. It is not a 5 because of that duplication; it is above a 3 because almost nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, real executable commands (check-ai-patterns.js, check-degeneration.js, normalize-punctuation.js, author_memory_commit.py query/record) plus concrete ❌/✅ before/after examples and report templates covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-phase sequence (扫描→诊断分级→逐项清除→确定性收尾→输出) with explicit validation checkpoints (re-scan scripts, 字数硬约束) and feedback loops (convergence termination rules, over-deletion recovery into 自然白话), satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a well-signaled 参考资料 table, one-level-deep references to real files (all verified to exist), and no nested reference chains. It is not a 5 because inline tables (自然文本基准, 替换参考) overlap the reference files, leaving minor organization gaps rather than a clean split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |