Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable, well-structured migration guide with concrete commands and validation guidance, succeeding as an instruction-only skill. The main gap is an explicit validate→fix→retry loop within the porting workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — invariants, numbered steps, and make targets with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands ("make fixture-oracle-generate", "make projection-parity-test", "make rust-fmt-check rust-clippy rust-test", "cerebro-platform evaluate-family") with specific CLI steps, but no complete copy-paste walkthrough leaves minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Porting a compatibility caller" section is a clear numbered sequence and validation is present (parity tests, "fails closed" invariants, "make changed-check"), so the destructive-operation cap does not apply; a fully explicit validate→fix→retry loop inside the porting steps would reach 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and two external docs are referenced one level deep with clear signaling of their contents ("authority model, compatibility port...", "sequencing and capability gaps"); no bundle files exist, and most project detail is inlined rather than split out, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |