Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally lean and well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete verification commands. Its main gap is the absence of explicit error-recovery guidance and any executable code examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no concept re-explanation or padding; every line (Instructions, Boundaries) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands ("make changed-check", "make verify") and specific test categories (config validation, preview decoding, pagination) are present, but as an instruction-only skill it lacks executable code examples for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence ends with a validation chain (focused tests, then changed-check, then verify), but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop describing what to do when a check fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Instructions, Boundaries) and a single clearly-signaled one-level reference to AGENTS.md, fitting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |