Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is well-structured with exemplary progressive disclosure — a lean overview that defers worked examples to a real, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference file. However, the inline body leans on generic storytelling knowledge Claude already has and offers frameworks without any applied example or operational process, leaving it more descriptive than instructive.
Suggestions
Replace the do's/don'ts restating widely known craft advice with one compact worked example (e.g. a short raw-metrics-to-headline transformation) so the body demonstrates rather than describes.
Add a short operational workflow — analyze data → find the surprise → pick an arc from references/details.md → draft headline last — with a checkpoint like "verify the headline states a number and a business impact".
Cut the "When to Use This Skill" section or fold it into one line, since it duplicates the frontmatter description's triggers verbatim in spirit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is compact but restates knowledge Claude already has ("Setup → Conflict → Resolution", "rule of three", "Show, don't tell - Let data speak"), and the "When to Use This Skill" list duplicates the frontmatter's Use-when triggers. Mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation, per anchor 3; not 4 because the generic-craft advice and duplication are more than minor trimmings. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Structures are named concretely (a six-step narrative arc, a three-pillar table) but nothing is applied: no worked example, template, or command appears inline, and the actual worked examples are deferred entirely to references. Some concrete but incomplete guidance, matching anchor 3 rather than 4's mostly-executable bar. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The narrative arc supplies a clear sequence for the deliverable (Hook → ... → Call to Action), but the body gives no sequenced process for getting from raw data to a finished story and includes no checkpoints for verifying the narrative lands. Sequence present with implicit/missing checkpoints, anchor 3; not 4 because the operational steps themselves are not laid out. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview and offloads detail to a real one-level-deep bundle file: "Detailed pattern documentation lives in `references/details.md`. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient." The referenced file exists and contains the worked examples and templates promised — a clear, well-signaled split matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |