deployment-pipeline-design
Design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security checks, and deployment orchestration. Use this skill when designing zero-downtime deployment pipelines, implementing canary rollout strategies, setting up multi-environment promotion workflows, or debugging failed deployment gates in CI/CD.
93
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (pipeline design, approval gates, security checks, deployment orchestration) and provides explicit trigger guidance with four concrete use cases. The description uses appropriate third-person voice, includes domain-specific but natural trigger terms, and carves out a distinct niche within the broader DevOps/CI-CD space.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'multi-stage CI/CD pipelines', 'approval gates', 'security checks', 'deployment orchestration', 'canary rollout strategies', 'multi-environment promotion workflows', and 'debugging failed deployment gates'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security checks, and deployment orchestration) and 'when' (explicit 'Use this skill when...' clause listing four specific trigger scenarios). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'CI/CD', 'deployment pipelines', 'canary rollout', 'zero-downtime deployment', 'approval gates', 'multi-environment promotion', 'deployment gates'. These cover a good range of terms a user working in this domain would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche around CI/CD pipeline design, deployment orchestration, and canary rollouts. The specific focus on approval gates, zero-downtime deployments, and multi-environment promotion workflows makes it unlikely to conflict with general DevOps or coding skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-structured skill with excellent actionability — nearly every concept is backed by executable configuration or code. The workflow is clearly sequenced with proper validation checkpoints and rollback automation. The main weakness is verbosity: the Input/Output, Purpose, and When to Use sections add ~40 lines of content that Claude could infer, and some inline comments are unnecessary, though the overall signal-to-noise ratio remains good.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically shorten the 'Purpose', 'Input/Output', and 'When to Use' sections — Claude can infer when to apply this skill from the content itself, and these sections consume tokens without adding actionable guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is quite long (~350+ lines) with some sections that could be tightened. The 'Input/Output' and 'When to Use' sections are somewhat verbose and describe things Claude can infer. The 'Purpose' section restates the title. However, the code examples and tables are dense and useful, so it's not egregiously padded. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Excellent actionability throughout — every deployment strategy has executable YAML/bash/Python examples, the GitHub Actions pipeline is complete and copy-paste ready, health check scripts are fully functional with proper error handling, and rollback commands are specific. The troubleshooting section provides concrete fixes, not vague advice. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The pipeline stages are clearly sequenced with an ASCII diagram and numbered breakdown. The full GitHub Actions example shows explicit job dependencies with validation checkpoints (health checks, integration tests, approval gates). Rollback is automated with `if: failure()` conditions, and the verify step has a retry loop — a proper feedback loop for error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill provides a comprehensive overview with well-organized sections (strategies, gates, health checks, rollback, troubleshooting) and clearly signals one-level-deep references to `references/advanced-strategies.md` for extended content. Related skills are listed at the end. Content is appropriately split — the main file covers core patterns while advanced topics are deferred. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (501 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- wshobson/agents
- Commit
27a7ed9
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.