Content
42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body excels at progressive disclosure — a lean overview pointing to a real, code-rich details file — but the overview itself adds little: it restates well-known pattern taxonomy without actionable guidance, decision criteria, or code. Shifting the body from pattern catalog to concrete decision heuristics and moving known-knowledge bullets into the reference would raise both conciseness and actionability.
Suggestions
Replace the known-knowledge bullet catalogs with decision guidance Claude cannot infer, e.g., when to choose synchronous vs asynchronous communication, or heuristics for drawing service boundaries.
Add at least one concrete inline artifact (a command, a code snippet, or a decision checklist) so the body is actionable on its own rather than purely descriptive.
Signal the reference per-topic (e.g., 'Decomposition worked examples: see references/details.md') and trim bullets like 'REST APIs / gRPC / GraphQL' that restate common knowledge.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly a catalog of textbook patterns Claude already knows — "REST APIs", "gRPC", "Circuit Breaker: Fail fast on repeated errors, Prevent cascade failures" — restating standard knowledge without added value, matching anchor 2's 'several unnecessary explanations'. It is not anchor 3 because nearly every bullet is known knowledge rather than just some, and not anchor 1 because there is no padded prose, just terse bullets. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The body offers only high-level pattern names with no code, commands, decision criteria, or steps — "Organize services around business functions", "Exponential backoff" — fitting anchor 2's 'high-level hints but missing the specific steps'. It is above anchor 1 because it does delegate to a real worked-examples file, but below anchor 3 since the inline guidance itself contains nothing executable or specific. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no multi-step process at all — the content is a topic taxonomy, matching anchor 3's 'sequence present but checkpoints missing' at best, since organizing the material has no decision sequence (e.g., how to pick a decomposition strategy or when synchronous vs asynchronous communication applies). Not anchor 4/5 because even for a reference skill there is no guidance on how to move from problem to pattern, and not anchor 2 because the sections are at least coherently organized topically. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a concise overview with a single, well-signaled, one-level-deep reference — "Detailed pattern documentation lives in `references/details.md`. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient" — and that file exists in the bundle with the promised worked examples, matching anchor 5. It is not anchor 4 because the structure is exactly the clean split the top anchor describes: overview inline, details one level deep. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |