monorepo-management

Master monorepo management with Turborepo, Nx, and pnpm workspaces to build efficient, scalable multi-package repositories with optimized builds and dependency management. Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies.

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable, packed with executable config and commands, but it is held back by conceptual padding and config duplication with references/details.md, the absence of validation checkpoints in the publishing/build workflows, and a reference pointer that is signposted once rather than indexed by topic. Tightening the overlap and adding explicit verification steps would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Move duplicated config (e.g. turbo.json) and detailed patterns fully into references/details.md, leaving SKILL.md as a concise overview, and replace the single 'see details.md' sentence with topic-indexed links (Setup, Nx, CI/CD, Code Sharing) to the relevant sections.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the publishing/build workflows (e.g. run `pnpm turbo run build && pnpm turbo run test` and confirm the dependency graph is acyclic before `pnpm changeset version`/`publish`).

Trim the 'Why Monorepos?' Advantages/Challenges bullets that restate concepts Claude already knows, and keep only the tooling/setup decisions that drive action.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean executable config, but it retains conceptual padding Claude already knows ('Why Monorepos?' with 'Advantages'/'Challenges' bullets like 'Shared code and dependencies', 'Better code visibility') and duplicates config (turbo.json) that also appears in references/details.md, so it could be tightened rather than earning the lean top anchor.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: `npx create-turbo@latest`, complete turbo.json/root-package.json/package.json with `exports`, `pnpm changeset` publish commands, and a changesets release workflow YAML, matching the top anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Sequences are present (Turborepo Setup, Publishing Packages) but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops (e.g. verify the dependency graph is acyclic or confirm builds pass before `changeset version`/`publish`); publishing is a batch operation, so per rubric guidance missing validation caps workflow_clarity at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	A real one-level reference exists and is signaled ('Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md'), but the SKILL.md/details.md split is not clean — turbo.json config and several patterns appear in both files — and the single-sentence pointer is not topic-indexed like the top-anchor example, leaving some structure but overlap and under-signaling.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it pairs a concrete capability statement with an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause and names specific tools, giving it a clear, non-conflicting niche. The only weakness is voice — the imperative 'Master...' reads as second person rather than the third person ('Manages', 'Sets up') the rubric rewards.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person to avoid the second-person imperative (e.g. 'Manages multi-package monorepos with Turborepo, Nx, and pnpm workspaces; optimizes builds and shared dependencies' instead of 'Master monorepo management with...').

Add a few more natural user phrasings to the trigger list (e.g. 'monorepo setup', 'pnpm workspaces', 'shared packages') to broaden natural-keyword coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names concrete tools (Turborepo, Nx, pnpm) and concrete actions (build scalable multi-package repositories, optimized builds, dependency management), but the imperative 'Master monorepo management with...' is second-person voice rather than third person, so per rubric voice guidelines the specificity score is reduced by one from a 3 to a 2.	2 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly answers both what ('Master monorepo management... build efficient, scalable multi-package repositories with optimized builds and dependency management') and when ('Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies') with an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, matching the top anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	'Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies' plus named tools (Turborepo, Nx, pnpm) gives good coverage of natural terms a user would say, matching the high anchor; slightly fewer colloquial variations (e.g. 'workspaces', 'shared packages') keep it at 3 rather than standing out.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The monorepo-management niche with specific tooling (Turborepo, Nx, pnpm workspaces) is clearly distinguishable and unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, matching the clear-niche anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: wshobson/agents
Commit: 5cc2549

Reviewed: about 4 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.