CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

monorepo-management

Master monorepo management with Turborepo, Nx, and pnpm workspaces to build efficient, scalable multi-package repositories with optimized builds and dependency management. Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies.

57

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/developer-essentials/skills/monorepo-management/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers concrete, executable monorepo setup and publishing guidance with a well-organized reference to a details file. It is held back by conceptual padding Claude already knows, and by the absence of validation checkpoints in the setup and publishing workflows.

Suggestions

Trim or move the 'Why Monorepos?' advantages/challenges list to references/details.md, since Claude already knows these tradeoffs — keep SKILL.md focused on setup and config it cannot infer.

Add explicit validation steps to the publishing workflow (e.g., verify `pnpm changeset version` output and run `turbo run build && test` before `changeset publish`) to create a validate-then-proceed feedback loop.

Make the reference to details.md more discoverable by listing the specific topics it covers (pnpm workspaces, dependency management, scripts) so Claude knows when to descend into it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with concrete config blocks, but the 'Why Monorepos?' section enumerates concepts Claude already knows ('Shared code and dependencies', 'Easier refactoring', 'Simplified dependency management'), adding padding that could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Executable guidance is strong throughout — `npx create-turbo@latest`, a complete turbo.json, root and package package.json, and copy-paste changesets publishing commands — with only minor gaps (e.g., no explicit tsconfig content shown).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A rough sequence exists (setup → configure → package structure → publish), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, and the publishing workflow proceeds without verifying changesets or build state before release.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good with clear section headers and a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to `references/details.md` (a real file) for detailed patterns; the inlined conceptual 'Why Monorepos?' content and config blocks represent minor organization gaps rather than a true overview-only design.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid description that clearly states what the skill covers and when to use it, with natural trigger terms and a distinct niche. The main weakness is goal-oriented rather than action-oriented framing of capabilities, which keeps specificity and completeness at the 3-4 level.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and tools ('Turborepo, Nx, and pnpm workspaces') and a few actions ('setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies'), but the 'what' is framed as abstract goals ('build efficient, scalable multi-package repositories') rather than a comprehensive list of concrete actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (master monorepo management to build scalable repositories with optimized builds and dependency management) and 'when' ('Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies') are explicit, but the 'what' leans on goal language rather than concrete capabilities, leaving it just shy of the anchor 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger terms users would say are present ('setting up monorepos', 'optimizing builds', 'shared dependencies') alongside tool names, giving good keyword coverage with only minor synonyms missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The monorepo niche with named tools (Turborepo/Nx/pnpm) is mostly distinct with specific triggers, though some overlap risk remains with general build-tooling or package-management skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
wshobson/agents
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.