Content
51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured overview with excellent progressive disclosure and good token efficiency, but the body itself lacks executable guidance and a sequenced workflow — the concrete, actionable material lives entirely in the referenced file.
Suggestions
Add at least one minimal inline code skeleton (e.g., a basic projector handler signature) so the body is actionable without requiring the reference file.
Convert the rebuild/checkpoint best-practices into a short numbered workflow (subscribe → apply events idempotently → checkpoint → verify lag) with an explicit validation step.
Tighten the opening "Comprehensive guide..." line and deduplicate the when-to-use bullets against the description's triggers to recover tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, avoids explaining CQRS/event-sourcing basics, and the diagram and table earn their tokens; only minor filler ("Comprehensive guide..." intro) and slight redundancy in the when-to-use bullets could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body offers directional guidance ("Make projections idempotent", "Store checkpoints") and a types table but no executable code or concrete commands — the actionable templates are deferred to references/details.md, leaving only high-level hints inline. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequenced procedural workflow with checkpoints; rebuilds and checkpoints appear only as best-practice bullets rather than a guided process, so the rough-sequence anchor is the best fit. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer to references/details.md (verified present, 428 lines, structured with Templates 1-5), and content is appropriately split with easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |