Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured overview with exemplary progressive disclosure to a real, one-level-deep reference. Its gaps are actionability and workflow clarity: no inline executable code and no explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints for rebuild operations.
Suggestions
Include at least one minimal inline executable code snippet (e.g., a basic projector skeleton) in the body so guidance is actionable without opening the reference.
Add an explicit numbered rebuild/replay workflow with a validation checkpoint (e.g., verify checkpoint position, replay, confirm read-model row counts) to make the multi-step process sequenced and verifiable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and token-efficient with no preamble explaining concepts Claude already knows, using a tight table and bullet Do's/Don'ts where every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The body gives concrete conceptual guidance (projection types, idempotency, checkpoints, transactions) but contains no inline executable code or commands, delegating all code to the reference file. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is organized and implies a process via best practices, but offers no explicit sequenced workflow or validation feedback loops for rebuild/replay operations where checkpoints matter. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview points to one-level-deep, well-signaled references ("Full template library and detailed worked examples live in references/details.md"), and the referenced file exists and is appropriately split from the overview. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |