CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

task-coordination-strategies

Decompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate multi-agent work with proper task descriptions and workload balancing. Use this skill when breaking down work for agent teams, managing task dependencies, or monitoring team progress.

82

1.10x
Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

92%

1.10x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/agent-teams/skills/task-coordination-strategies/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, actionable, and well-organized with real supporting bundle files. Its main weaknesses are missing validation/feedback checkpoints in the rebalancing workflow and the absence of inline navigation to the existing reference files.

Suggestions

Add inline links to the bundled reference files where relevant (e.g., 'See references/dependency-graphs.md for more patterns') so progressive disclosure is clearly signaled.

Insert an explicit validation/verification checkpoint into the Rebalancing Steps workflow (e.g., confirm the reassigned task's blockedBy dependencies are still satisfiable before notifying teammates).

Move the full inline task-description template into a reference file and keep only a short pointer plus one minimal example in SKILL.md to tighten token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and well-structured with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; tables and diagrams are tight. A few sections (e.g., the full inline task template) could be trimmed slightly, keeping it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete TaskCreate/TaskUpdate calls, a full task-description template, and specific rebalancing steps; mostly executable with minor gaps where the template is scaffolding rather than fully copy-paste-ready code.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequenced rebalancing steps and dependency principles are present, but operations that reassign work across a team (batch/state-changing) lack explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, which caps this dimension at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is reasonable and two real reference files exist in the bundle, but the body never inline-signals those references (no "See dependency-graphs.md" links), so references are not clearly signaled and some content that could live in references is inlined.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete capabilities in third person, provides an explicit "Use this skill when..." trigger clause, and carves out a distinct niche. Minor gaps in trigger-term synonym coverage keep it just below perfect on two dimensions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions — "Decompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate multi-agent work with proper task descriptions and workload balancing" — covering the domain comprehensively, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (decompose/design/coordinate) and when ("Use this skill when breaking down work for agent teams, managing task dependencies, or monitoring team progress") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say ("breaking down work for agent teams", "managing task dependencies", "monitoring team progress") with good coverage, but misses common synonyms/variants that would push it to 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (multi-agent task coordination) with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk; not quite the maximally-distinct score-5 example but mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
wshobson/agents
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.