Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured overview with excellent progressive disclosure to one real reference, but the body leans on WCAG concepts Claude already knows and lacks a sequenced audit workflow or concrete inline remediation steps.
Suggestions
Replace the POUR/conformance-level exposition with a concise audit workflow: e.g. 1) run automated scan, 2) manual keyboard/screen-reader verification, 3) log findings by impact, 4) apply remediation patterns, with a validation/recheck step before closing.
Move the "Common Violations by Impact" tree into references/details.md alongside the remediation patterns, keeping the body to triggers, the workflow, and the pointer to details.md.
Inline one or two concrete remediation snippets (e.g. a labelled input vs. missing-label fix) so the skill is actionable without always loading the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body restates concepts Claude already knows (POUR principles, A/AA/AAA conformance table, common-violations tree) and the "When to Use" list duplicates the description's triggers, so it is mostly efficient but carries unnecessary explanation. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It offers some concrete guidance (violation taxonomy, do/don't lists) but no executable code or commands, and the actual remediation patterns are deferred to references/details.md rather than given inline. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An implied audit-then-remediate flow exists via the violation-by-impact taxonomy and best-practices lists, but there is no explicit numbered audit sequence with validation checkpoints for a multi-step task. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview with a single, clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference ("Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md"), and that file exists in the bundle. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |