Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with sound progressive disclosure to a real reference file, but as a workflow skill it stops at principles and triggers rather than showing a concrete sequenced TDD/verification workflow or executable examples.
Suggestions
Add a short sequenced TDD workflow (RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR) with explicit checkpoint/gate verification steps rather than only listing the cycle as a trigger.
Include one concrete example of a git commit + note format and a plan.md progress update so the best-practice directives are actionable rather than abstract.
Surface at least one key pattern inline (e.g. what a phase checkpoint verification looks like) instead of deferring all specifics to references/details.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, mostly bullet lists and short directives with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the only mild redundancy is the opening paragraph restating the frontmatter description. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Best-practice items ("One logical change per commit", "Update plan.md right after task completion") give directive guidance but no concrete commands, examples, or templates; concrete detail is deferred to references, leaving key specifics missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The TDD red-green-refactor cycle and verification protocol are named but not laid out as a sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints; checkpoint/gate mentions are implicit and unordered, so the workflow gap caps this at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview lives in SKILL.md with a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to the real file `references/details.md` ("Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient"), with content appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |