Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and action-oriented with solid worked examples and a clear end-to-end workflow, but it is padded with conceptual explanations Claude already knows and is monolithic rather than progressively disclosing detail via bundle files.
Suggestions
Trim the Overview and Key Concepts sections to remove textbook definitions of GWAS, LD, credible sets, posterior probability, and L2G that Claude already knows; keep only the operational thresholds and method-selection guidance.
Move the Data Classes, Tools Used, and Fine-Mapping Methods Compared sections into reference files under references/ (e.g. reference.md, tools.md) and link to them from SKILL.md, leaving a lean overview with one-level-deep pointers.
Replace the placeholder 'from python_implementation import ...' with the real import path (or document it as the MCP tool entry point) so the code examples are genuinely copy-paste executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body mixes genuinely operational material with notable conceptual teaching Claude already knows — the Overview re-explains GWAS and LD, Key Concepts defines credible sets/posterior probability/L2G, and the Methods Compared table explains SuSiE/FINEMAP/PAINTOR/CAVIAR — so it could be tightened considerably. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete code examples (prioritize_causal_variants, get_credible_sets_for_study, search_gwas_studies_for_disease) with documented data-class fields and tool listings give mostly executable guidance, though the 'from python_implementation import' placeholder keeps it just short of copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Complete Fine-Mapping Analysis' section lays out a clear 5-step sequence (find studies → get loci → filter by gene → prioritize → summarize/validate), and as a read-only analysis skill it reasonably lacks hard validation checkpoints, leaving only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers give reasonable structure, but with no references/scripts/assets bundle files present, the ~310-line SKILL.md inlines content (data-class API, tools reference, methods table, interpretation thresholds) that would benefit from being split into separate referenced files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |