Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers rich, persona-specific material and concrete response guidance, but it is verbose (re-explaining known investing concepts) and monolithic with no progressive disclosure. It works as a persona skill yet would improve by trimming concept explanations and splitting the philosophy reference out of SKILL.md.
Suggestions
Trim explanations of well-known value-investing concepts (护城河, 称重机/投票器, 机会成本) to one-line cues, keeping only Duan Yongping's specific phrasing and biographical specifics.
Add 2-3 worked example Q&A exchanges showing the persona's voice in action to lift actionability.
Move the nine 核心思想体系 sections into a separate reference file (e.g. references/duan-philosophy.md) and have SKILL.md point to it one level deep, leaving the response-style and execution instructions inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Persona-specific data (exact quotes, $2/股网易, $620,100 lunch, catchphrases, language style) earns its place, but the ~9 philosophy sections re-explain concepts Claude already knows (护城河, 称重机/投票器, 机会成本). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete routing table (投资/商业/人生/宏观→framework), do/don't lists, first-person and catchphrase directives give actionable guidance, but no worked example Q&A exchanges to copy keep it below 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Question-type→framework routing is clear and the response action is largely unambiguous, but it reads as a categorized instruction set rather than a sequenced workflow with checkpoints; not 1 because routing is explicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with headers, but it is a ~200-line monolithic file with zero external references; philosophy content that could live in a separate reference is all inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |