CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

content-engine

为X、LinkedIn、TikTok、YouTube、新闻通讯和跨平台重新利用的多平台活动创建平台原生内容系统。适用于当用户需要社交媒体帖子、帖子串、脚本、内容日历,或一个源资产在多个平台上清晰适配时。

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, instruction-only skill with genuinely terse platform-specific rules, a clear repurposing workflow, and a pre-delivery quality checklist. Its main gaps are the absence of example outputs (hooks or post templates) and a small amount of generic writing advice that duplicates what Claude already knows.

Suggestions

Add one short example per platform (e.g., a strong opening hook for X vs. LinkedIn) so the guidance is grounded in concrete output patterns rather than rules alone.

Trim generic-advice bullets such as '使用短段落' and '避免滥用话题标签' in favor of skill-specific constraints, and de-duplicate the hook/CTA guidance repeated between 核心规则 and 质量门槛.

Add a feedback loop to the workflow: when a draft fails a 质量门槛 check, state to revise the hook/CTA and re-check before delivery.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean, bulleted, and free of concept explanations, but a few generic-advice bullets ('使用短段落', '避免滥用话题标签') and mild duplication between 核心规则 and 质量门槛 (hooks and CTAs each appear twice) could be trimmed — anchor 4, not the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific guidance — '前 3 秒必须抓住注意力', '每 20-30 秒刷新一次视觉内容', '一个演示、一个主张、一个行动号召' — and a concrete deliverables list, but offers no example hooks or sample post structures, leaving minor gaps versus the fully-executable anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The repurposing cascade is a clear 5-step numbered sequence and the 质量门槛 section acts as a pre-delivery checklist, but there is no feedback loop saying what to do when a draft fails a gate — anchor 4 rather than the explicit error-recovery anchor 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and none are needed: the skill is a self-contained overview with clearly labeled sections (何时激活, 平台指南, 流程, 交付物, 质量门槛) where all content is appropriately inline and navigation is trivial, matching the well-organized-overview anchor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states a concrete what and an explicit, trigger-rich when clause with named platforms and deliverables. It is only held back by a slightly abstract opening phrase ('创建平台原生内容系统') and a few missing natural synonyms in the trigger terms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and multiple concrete deliverables ('社交媒体帖子、帖子串、脚本、内容日历') across named platforms (X, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, newsletters), but the core 'what' clause ('创建平台原生内容系统') is slightly abstract, leaving minor gaps versus the comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what it does ('为...多平台活动创建平台原生内容系统') and when to use it via an explicit '适用于当用户需要...时' clause with concrete trigger deliverables, matching the both-what-and-when anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say — platform names plus '社交媒体帖子', '帖子串', '脚本', '内容日历' — but misses common variations such as '推文', '文案', or '短视频', so it falls just short of the comprehensive-synonyms anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The multi-platform repurposing niche with named platforms is mostly distinct with specific triggers, but it could still overlap with generic copywriting or single-platform writing skills, matching anchor 4 rather than the minimal-conflict anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh

Path

docs/zh-CN/skills/content-engine/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.