Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, well-sequenced, lean body with complete executable examples and clear validation checkpoints; its only weakness is the absence of progressive disclosure, since everything is inline with no reference files to offload detail into.
Suggestions
Move the more extensive patterns (tool calling, snapshot streaming, SwiftUI integration) into reference files such as references/tools.md and references/streaming.md, keeping SKILL.md as an overview with one-level-deep links.
Collapse the near-duplicate '何时激活' and '何时使用' trigger lists into a single section to tighten the body and remove redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and code-heavy, focusing on FoundationModels API specifics Claude is unlikely to know (availability states, @Guide constraints, .content vs .output) rather than padding with basics; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, executable Swift examples for every core pattern (availability switch, sessions, @Generable, Tool protocol, streaming, SwiftUI integration) that are copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step patterns are numbered (tool definition → session → error handling; @Generable type → request) with an explicit availability-check checkpoint before session creation and a tool-error feedback loop for recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections but is entirely monolithic — all ~240 lines and detailed API patterns (tools, streaming, SwiftUI) live inline with no external reference files, matching the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |