CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

project-guidelines-example

基于真实生产应用程序的项目特定技能(Skill)模板示例。

36

Quality

32%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/project-guidelines-example/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with complete, executable code and commands, and is reasonably well-organized, but it is somewhat verbose for a single-file skill and lacks validation feedback loops and genuine one-level-deep reference files.

Suggestions

Move the full code-pattern examples (Claude integration, useApi hook, fetchApi) into a dedicated reference file and keep only a concise representative snippet in SKILL.md with a clearly signaled link.

Add explicit validate->fix->retry checkpoints to the deployment workflow (e.g. 'gcloud run deploy ... then verify the service is healthy; if not, inspect logs and redeploy').

Create the referenced bundle files (coding-standards.md, backend-patterns.md, frontend-patterns.md, tdd-workflow/) or remove the dangling references so navigation is real and one level deep.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and skips explaining basic concepts, but the full architecture ASCII diagram, complete file tree, and several long verbatim code blocks (hooks, fetchApi, Claude integration) add bulk that a competent model could infer or that could be split out, matching the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable, complete code examples (FastAPI models, fetchApi, Claude tool-use integration, useApi hook) and concrete copy-paste commands for tests and deployment, matching the 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready' anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The deployment section gives a sequenced checklist and ordered commands, but there are no explicit validation/re-run checkpoints after build or deploy (the checklist is a pre-flight list, not a validate->fix->retry loop), so it matches 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints implicit'.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into sections and ends with a '相关技能' pointer list (coding-standards.md, tdd-workflow/, etc.), but those referenced paths are not present in any bundle directory and all detailed content is inline in one SKILL.md rather than split across one-level-deep reference files, matching 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

0%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a vague meta-statement about the skill being a template example, with no concrete capabilities and no trigger guidance. It fails to tell a user or Claude when to invoke it or what it actually does.

Suggestions

Rewrite the description to state concrete capabilities the skill provides (e.g. 'Documents the architecture, file structure, code patterns, testing, and deployment workflow for the Zenith project').

Add an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause naming natural user phrasings (e.g. 'Use when working on the Zenith codebase or asking about its architecture, conventions, or deployment').

Replace generic meta-language ('模板示例') with specific, distinctive terms that differentiate this project skill from other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description states only '基于真实生产应用程序的项目特定技能(Skill)模板示例' — it names no concrete actions or capabilities, only describing what the skill is (a template example), so it matches the 'vague or no actions' anchor.

1 / 3

Completeness

It neither states what the skill concretely does nor gives any 'use when...' trigger guidance, so both 'what' and 'when' are weak/missing per the completeness rubric.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

There are no natural trigger keywords a user would say to invoke this skill; '项目特定技能' and '模板示例' are generic meta-descriptive jargon, matching the 'no natural keywords' anchor.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'项目特定技能模板示例' is extremely generic and would overlap with many project-skill descriptions, matching the 'very generic; would conflict with many skills' anchor.

1 / 3

Total

4

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.