Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, actionable four-phase self-debugging workflow with templates, a diagnosis table, and feedback-loop guidance. It is concise and clearly sequenced, with only minor gaps in explicit validation framing and no need for external bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-structured with templates, a diagnosis table, and checklists; nearly every section earns its place, with only minor framing prose ('Before trying to recover, record the failure precisely') that could be trimmed, so it sits just below the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready markdown templates, a specific pattern→cause→check diagnosis table, and a concrete ordered recovery-heuristics list give mostly executable guidance; actions are framed as directives rather than literal commands, leaving minor gaps vs anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced four-phase loop (Capture→Diagnosis→Recovery→Report) with checklists and a described feedback loop ('run one direct check → change the plan only if the check supports it') is present, but validation checkpoints are embedded in templates rather than explicit numbered steps as in the anchor 5 example. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single SKILL.md is well-organized into clearly headed sections (When to Activate, Scope Boundaries, Four-Phase Loop, Recovery Heuristics, Integration with ECC, Output Standard) with external skill references signaled clearly; at ~150 lines with no bundle files it is appropriately single-file but exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, so it does not reach anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |