CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

sniff-test-portfolio

Add-on to the sniff-test skill that looks across many initiatives on a portfolio Kanban for board-level patterns — duplicate/shadowing initiatives, WIP clustering, stale-status sweeps, experiment scope creep, and portfolio risk balance (Explore/Discovery vs. Build & Deliver split). Use when reviewing a whole board or portfolio, prepping a sponsor/ELT portfolio review, or deciding where the portfolio is over- or under-invested. For sniffing a single initiative, use sniff-test.

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, self-contained analytical add-on: concrete Smell/Move guidance per pattern, a deliberate approach table, explicit ordering rules, and a quality-gates checklist that functions as validation. The main gaps are the absence of a worked output example and a feedback loop for degraded inputs, plus minor verbosity in the input-coverage caveat.

Suggestions

Add a short worked example of the default output — e.g. a 2–3 row sample of the initiatives × verified stage × clarity × pattern-flags table with one cross-cutting finding and a stated risk-balance split.

Merge the thin-input caveat in 'How to Run Me' into a single sentence; the two consecutive sentences both say that findings degrade when per-initiative evidence is unreachable.

Add a feedback loop for the common failure mode: what to do when base sniff-test reads are missing or stale (e.g. fall back to a quick single-item sniff before consuming the reads, then re-check the quality gates).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and earns its tokens — each pattern gets a compact 'Smell:'/'Move:' pair and the scan approaches sit in a table — with only minor trimmable spots, e.g. 'With thin input I'll work from whatever board snapshot you give me and flag low coverage — board-level findings degrade fast when the per-initiative evidence isn't reachable' largely repeats the preceding sentence. It is not a 5 because a few sentences could be tightened, and it is clearly above a 3 since nothing explains concepts Claude already knows.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable for an analytical skill — each pattern names detection cues and moves ('fuzzy boundaries between a parent initiative and its "refinement"'; 're-cut to the riskiest assumption, or graduate it honestly to a committed Execute/Build'), and output modes are specified. It is not a 5 because there is no worked example of the default output (e.g. a sample initiatives × stage × flags table or a concrete risk-balance split instance).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is clear (prerequisite base reads → point at the system of record → state approach and altitude → scan patterns → choose output mode) with explicit checkpoints — 'A stale-status sweep comes before any Explore/Discovery-vs-Build&Deliver split, or the split is fiction' — and a Quality Gates checklist. It is not a 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g. what to do when base reads are missing), though the operation is read-only analysis so no destructive-operation cap applies.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single self-contained file with well-organized sections and one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('Base skill: `sniff-test.md` and its references'). No bundle files exist and each pattern is only 1–3 lines, so nothing belongs in a separate file; navigation via section headers is easy.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person, specific, comprehensive on both what and when, with concrete trigger phrases and explicit routing to disambiguate it from the base sniff-test skill. The only weakness is a handful of missing natural synonyms that would broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names five concrete detection capabilities — 'duplicate/shadowing initiatives, WIP clustering, stale-status sweeps, experiment scope creep, and portfolio risk balance (Explore/Discovery vs. Build & Deliver split)' — giving comprehensive, specific coverage of what the skill does. It is not a 4 because the action list is comprehensive for its domain rather than having minor gaps.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('looks across many initiatives on a portfolio Kanban for board-level patterns') and when ('Use when reviewing a whole board or portfolio, prepping a sponsor/ELT portfolio review, or deciding where the portfolio is over- or under-invested') with concrete trigger phrases. Not a 4 because the 'when' clause is fully explicit and specific, not merely adequate.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases like 'portfolio Kanban', 'reviewing a whole board or portfolio', 'sponsor/ELT portfolio review', and 'over- or under-invested' are present and read like things a user would actually say. It is not a 5 because plausible synonyms such as 'portfolio health', 'board audit', or 'program-level review' are missing, though it clearly exceeds the 3 anchor's 'some relevant keywords'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche (board/portfolio-level patterns vs. single initiative) and explicitly routes away from the sibling skill — 'For sniffing a single initiative, use sniff-test' — minimizing conflict risk. It is not a 4 because the disambiguation from the most closely related skill is explicit rather than left implicit.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

yyeret/portfolio-pdlc

Path

skills/sniff-test-portfolio/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.